Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cast and crew of A Canterbury Tale
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Coredesat 07:18, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Cast and crew of A Canterbury Tale (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
WP:NOT - the important cast and crew should be mentioned in the main A Canterbury Tale article (as they already are). No need for a seperate article listing every extra, bit-part actor, and minor crew member. This list is already available on IMDb for anyone that would want to read it. Masaruemoto 00:08, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Belongs on an Archers website. Here it is just listcruft. -- RHaworth 00:53, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Readers can go to imdb from the external links if they want to learn about every single cast member. If we keep an article like this, then there are going to be hundreds of film articles that will start having the same thing. --Nehrams2020 04:33, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. Jmlk17 05:16, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per above comments. Loved the movie, but this is TMI. Bearian 00:34, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, as the main article doesn't contain many of the actor or crew credits that I would not call "minor". While we should avoid cruft, I'm not sure how many people understand how involved some of these positions actually are. -- Ned Scott 02:02, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.