Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1992 Rugby League World Cup Final

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) LibStar (talk) 00:38, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1992 Rugby League World Cup Final (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

complete duplication of main world cup article content 1989–1992 Rugby League World Cup. and includes information not specifically about the final. Also nominating:

LibStar (talk) 07:09, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:37, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It's all explained and duplicated almost word for word in the main article.

LibStar (talk) 08:17, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:29, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The finals are often notable from a stand alone perspective. They are not all duplications, the first one I've examined is the 1954 articles - their is nothing in the main article about the Television Continental Exchange or a description in prose of the final. I suspect in many cases, if their is a duplication, then there is too much information in the RLWC main page, and some of that should be removed into the article specifically about the Final. Mattlore (talk) 20:24, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.