Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Women in the Bangladesh Army
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) —Compassionate727 (T·C) 20:53, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Women in the Bangladesh Army (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. There are no independent sources. Foxsh (talk) 06:05, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, obviously. Note that creating this AfD is the nominator's first and only edit. WP:QUACK. Jfire (talk) 06:21, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep nomination without merit. Mccapra (talk) 07:59, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Military, and Bangladesh. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 12:37, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. No good reason for deletion. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:56, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. There are enough independent sources. Mehedi Abedin 14:33, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. not sure what the nominator means by "no independent sources" LegalSmeagolian (talk) 19:58, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.